Pardon our mess; we're still rebuilding after having been hacked. Pardon our mess; we're still rebuilding after having been hacked. Pardon our mess; we're still rebuilding after having been hacked. Pardon our mess; we're still rebuilding after having been hacked. Pardon our mess; we're still rebuilding after having been hacked.HopeNChangeCartoons.com
DayByDayCartoon.com
 

“The phrase’s actual meaning implies the increasing likelihood of suppressed feelings for the contrary of that which is being argued. I.e., the more passionate and fervent the argument, the greater likelihood the cause is a suppression of belief for the contrary argument, and the subsequent confirmation that it is the (actual) truer statement.” -Wikipedia.org

Through much of the last 20 years, Conservatives have been called ‘nazis’ (referring to the propaganda-fed bigoted, caustic and violent socialist movement in Germany many years ago, which is the direct opposite of Conservative values of small government, strong individual freedoms, and allowing a market-based economy).

Despite the Conservative viewpoint that less government is better government, the Left regularly refers to the Right as ‘fascists’ — confusing (either deliberately or out of ignorance) Nationalism with radical authoritarian nationalism (again see socialism and Nazis, above). Worse, the Left’s expectation that their own ideas can and should be exerted by force over citizens makes this accusation humorously ironic, if this reality weren’t so appalling.

Then, Conservatives were blamed for their ‘violent rhetoric’ (discounting the fact that of documented threats and actual physcal attacks, the Left attacks the Right more often by 5-to-1).

When Conservatives finally got up off the couch (becoming fatigued of having let the Left sculpt water-cooler chatter nationally for decades) and spoke up for state-over-State, and Freedom-over-’Fairness’ — the Left again accused Conservatives of THOUGHTS, WORDS, and TACTICS that ONLY THE LEFT USES.

Nancy Pelosi, the American Left’s counterpart to Bagdad Bob, takes every opportunity afforded her by the cheering Media to call gatherings on the Right (made up of a wide cross-section of voters from all age groups, creeds, financial status, and… skin color) as both ‘Astroturf’ and ‘Racists’ — while protests engineered by the left (complete with professionally produced signs, paid protesters bused in from out-of-state, thousands of union-printed tshirts, and physically violent union enforcers) were bragged of as ‘grass roots’.

I’m still waiting for ANYONE on the Left (meaning the ‘impartial’ Media) to acknowledge that ALL of the things that they’ve constently accused the Tea Partiers of (falsely) has ONLY been perpetrated(and surpassed) by the Occupy protesters.

For those who align themselves with today’s Left, there is no moral high ground any more. You have used it all as fill dirt in attempts to bury both the voice of the Right, and your own credibility.

LINK: “Occucommies Attack Starbucks, Police” (Moonbattery.com)
LINK: “NYC: Occupy Protesters Smash Starbucks, Shout “All Pigs Must Die”” (WeaselZippers.us)

 

I’m always watching the local ads for low-cost firearms — sorry, I’m not the guy that spends $600 on a firearm; not that there’s anything wrong with that, but our family budget is definitely more mac-n-cheese than wine-and-cheese. Likewise, most of our friends drive ‘normal’ cars; not Volvos, Beemers or Caddies. So when a friend is thinking about buying a first firearm for some light target shooting, a 12-guage shotgun or an AR-15 with handle and scope is not on their shopping list.

Though purists and gun-nuts may tell you that the tiny .22 round (which is narrower than a #2 pencil) is not formidable enough to be considered a home-defense round, a limited-function low-end firearm may still be better than a tennis racket or frying pan to defend your castle. (The comparison photo to the right shows a dime, a .32 round, a nickel and a .22 round.)

LINK: “The Big Page of Cartridge Comparisons” (HerHog.com)
LINK: “The myth of handgun stopping power” (BayouRenaissanceMan.blogspot.com)

Most new shooters begin with a .22-caliber rifle — either with a 10-round capacity or a single-shot model (which many parents are happier with for safety reasons) like the Crickett — these run between $99 and $200.

But if you’d like to look at a handgun instead, a great option for a beginner might be the Rough Rider Single-Action Revolver by Heritage Manufacturing, an American company that does it’s work right here with American parts and local hands. I found it on sale this week at our local Gander Mountain for $180.

Here are some of the features that make it a great beginner handgun:

  • Low cost
  • Safety (most revolvers do not include one)
  • Single-action means user has to pull back hammer to cock before each shot is fired
  • Small caliber means lower noise, lower kick, and lower expense for ammo
  • Revolvers tend to be easy to maintain and don’t jam
  • Overall size about 10″ long with grip comfortable in many sizes of hands
  • Comes complete with two interchangeable 6-shot cylinders (.22 LR and .22 Magnum)
  • (There is a newer version available at some retailers for a few dollars more that includes 9-shot cylinders)

 

Almighty and most merciful Father, we humbly beseech Thee, of Thy great goodness, to restrain these immoderate rains with which we have had to contend. Grant us fair weather for Battle. Graciously hearken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that, armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory, and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies and establish Thy justice among men and nations. -‘The Patton Prayer’

A church’s doctrinal teachings and your own personal beliefs may affect how you process the following information — and that’s as it should be. My goal here isn’t to convince you to change your mind about the ethos involved in physical security; but to consider appropriate measures and preparedness that best suits your school and/or church’s needs in a way that still meshes with your organization’s core values, principles, and abilities.

For instance, do you feel that any, all, or none of the following items should be available to your teachers, administrators, pastors and laypeople:

  • Lockable external doors
  • Fire extinguishers
  • First Aid kit
  • Publicly-accessible phone
  • Interior rooms that can be locked from the inside without a key (for refuge in an emergency)
  • Background checks on staff who care for children or may be alone with children at any time
  • Regular training for staff and volunteers that covers emergency preparedness

Few people can argue about whether anything in the above list is appropriate where the safety of others is one of your concerns and responsibilities.

Next, there are some things that may or may not fit everyone ideologically; but nonetheless are worth discussing — for instance, if you disagree with a tool or tactic on principle, be ready to discuss your backup or secondary plan to fill that need.

  • Security team/trained ushers on foot and patrolling hallways, aisle, doorways, parking lots
  • Alarm/surveillance system with video at entrances
  • Land-line (not cellular) phones in every room
  • Published policy (published to your members) on legal concealed-carry (this may or may not include your requirement or suggestion of formal training before being allowed on your private property; or it may clarify your zero-tolerance policy)
  • Protect & Serve Ministry (enlisting professional police, paramedic, and fire personnel who are members of your organization to provide time, attention, and visible presence to your campus in their off-work hours)

I’m hoping that some of these ideas spur discussion among church and school planners everywhere. And I’d like to close with a thought on training and mindset. Some organizations get a handful of eager volunteers who enjoy a day at the firing range, and who are legally able to carry concealed in their state — and then these people are deployed with as much care as possible in strategic locations around the facility. Or maybe some groups are happy to simply have a number of trusted individuals interspersed among the congregation (like plainclothes ‘Air Marshals’ on an airplane). But if every one of those individuals is not properly trained to react properly in an intense situation, your organization — and worse, the individuals under its roof — may be in double jeopardy when Bad Things Happen.

  • Make the effort to find people who have the right experience to assist you with your security plan, as well as individuals qualified to carry out that plan.
  • Know the legal ramifications of your plan, and the impact of actions or inaction you advise for your staff.
  • The very idea of an emergency indicates that something unexpected is occuring. Have discussions with your staff and membership about what they CAN expect or rely on being true when things can, do, and must happen in rapid fashion.

Like any good team, having good Leadership, Planning, Teamwork and Practice can make your environment a safer one so that people who visit can concentrate on your organization’s Message, and help them abandon their other worries at the door. Addressing security concerns quietly and effectively should mean that your Core Mission is the focus for those you serve — not the roof under which the service takes place.

LINK: “9 Lessons Learned from the Oikos College Shooting” (ActiveResponseTraining.com)
LINK: church security manual (search on Google.com)
LINK: “New Life Church Pastor Brady Boyd speaks out on church security preparedness” (BuckeyeFirearms.org)
LINK: “Armed Vigilantes and Church Security” (YouTube.com)
LINK: “Joined my Church’s Safety & Security team this week…” (DefensiveCarry.com)
LINK: “The Gift of Fear and Other Survival Signals that Protect Us From Violence” (Amazon.com)

 

For the Right (and Extreme Right, and most everyone else), Science is Science.

For the Extreme Left, ‘Science’ is a religion… an ideology.

It’s not the science we learned in 7th grade, where Truth is discovered through analysis and experimentation; to them, Truth is decided — THEN proven through analysis and data collection. Just like people who ‘make’ the Bible ‘prove’ their situational ethics, the word ‘science’ can be leveraged to justify murder, economic controls, behavioral constraints and political oneupmanship.

But just as it is with the Bible, real Truth does not bend for Science.

This fact is why there is such a concerted effort in our generation to separate those who find faith in either — to explain that Science and Biblical understanding are not in conflict in any way is to challenge the abusers (of both science and religion) that Truth is not theirs to sculpt — but to discover.

 

Maybe you thought the days of citizens allowing the brutish and hateful to lead them into lynch mobs were gone.

You’d be wrong.

Sheeple just don’t realize how easy it is to be turned from individuals who think — into mobs that don’t.

(Whole feature film “The Tin Star” with Anthony Perkins and Anthony Mann, 1957, available here: http://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=RAd04cfF4i0 )

 

This is the MAIN question that has me so angry at the crackpots that keep voting these sociopathic megalomaniacs into power over and over again.

It’s not the Great Enabler’s fault — he’s just letting Congress do what they’ve been trying to get away with for decades.

It’s not the Supreme Court’s fault — they’re just whittling down the Constitution one phrase at a time like they’ve been raised to do (long before they ever donned a polyester robe).

It’s not the Congress’ fault — those members who are getting away with something are only doing what they’ve been trained to do by the last dozen generations of politicians: Stay in office, make powerful people happy, and blame everything on people who can’t do enough to get rid of you.

The fault lies directly at the feet of the voters — and those parents, teachers, preachers, and authors who have slighted any opportunity to raise the next generation to understand and identify Evil.

There are an estimated 30 million Conservatives out there who do not vote. Those who do often speak of not voting because their favorite right-of-center politician might not get to sit in a particular chair. But speaking as on ACTIVE voter who’s ability to provide food, a safe place for my children to sleep, basic healthcare, and a decent education has been threatened by game-players who use the words ‘Hope’, ‘Fairness’, ‘Equal’, ‘Affirmative’, ‘Rights’, ‘Transparency’, ‘Bi-Partisan’, ‘Post-Racial’ and even ‘Science’ to strong-arm outcomes that are exactly the opposite of what the dictionary explains those words to mean — I’m DONE letting people be comfortable in their ignorance.

I will only sit back down (maybe) when the three branches of the Federal government once again act as checks and balances against one another, when the Press actually acts on behalf of the people instead of their own hegemony, and when Americans matter more than the Unions, Activists, Organizers, and Agencies that only pretend to support them.

 

LINK: “Neighborhood Watch Program Manual” provided by National Sheriffs’ Association (USAOnWatch.org)
LINK: “The Trayvon Martin Spectacle” (Moonbattery.com)
LINK: “Jesse Jackson refuses to comment on New Black Panther’s bounty” (TheRightScoop.com)
LINK: “New Black Panther leader Malik Shabazz threatens to burn Detroit down” (Examiner.com)
LINK: “Zimmerman friend: Shooting not a racial incident” (CBSNews.com)
LINK: “Trayvon Martin Shooter Told Cops Teenager Went For His Gun” (CBSNews.com)
LINK: “Former NAACP leader accuses Sharpton and Jackson of ‘exploiting’ Trayvon Martin” (DailyCaller.com)
LINK: “Police: Zimmerman says Trayvon decked him with one blow then began hammering his head” (OrlandoSentinel.com)
LINK: “Obama’s Trayvon Comments Could Inflame Situation” (WhiteHouseDossier.com)
LINK: “Trayvon Martin case takes an intense turn” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “Black Panther Threats Get Hispanic Man Kicked Out of College” (PJMedia.com)
LINK: “Trayvon Martin Death: Police Say Witnesses Back Zimmerman’s Story” (NewsMax.com)
LINK: “Trayvon’s Tweets – the Daily Caller” (Scribd.com)
LINK: “Trayvon Martin case: Secret witness for self-defense claim” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “Elderly Couple In Fear Over Spike Lee Tweet: Star erroneously linked Floridians to man who killed Trayvon” (TheSmokingGun.com)
LINK: “Holder lets Black Panthers skate – again” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “Dem pulled from House floor for Trayvon hoodie” (WashingtonExaminer.com)
LINK: “Police incident report fills in details on Trayvon Martin shooting” (DailyCaller.com)
LINK: “It’s Not About Stand Your Ground: We should reserve judgment, but it seems that Zimmerman acted lawfully.” (NationalReview.com)
LINK: “Elderly couple forced out of home after tweet claims killer of Trayvon Martin lives there” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “High School Students Protesting Trayvon Case Loot Walgreens” (WCTV.tv)
LINK: “Analysis: Manufacturing the Martin narrative” (HumanEvents.com)
LINK: “MSNBC Hosts a Lynch Mob” (Spectator.org)
LINK: “What If Your Son Doesn’t Look Like President Obama?” (Spectator.org)
LINK: “‘He Looks Black’: NBC Launches Internal Investigation into Selective Editing of Zimmerman Police Tape” (TheBlaze.com)
LINK: “Al Sharpton, Spike Lee, Farrakhan and Obama Responsible for Black on White Hate Crimes Accross the United States” (DividedStates.com)
LINK: “The Real Trayvon Martin Scandal: Minorities Have Bigger Problems Than Trumped-Up Hate Crimes. So Does America.” (VDare.com)
LINK: “MSNBC Concedes Injury To Back Of Zimmerman’s Head Apparent On Police Video” (Breitbart.com)
LINK: “ABC Not Sure Whether Death Threats In Trayvon Martin Aftermath ‘Going Too Far’” (NewsBusters.org)
LINK: “Zimmerman family member calls NAACP ‘racists,’ says ‘there will be blood on your hands’ if George is hurt” (DailyCaller.com)
LINK: “Dems Hope to Use Trayvon Martin’s Death For Federal Ban On Concealed Carry Permits” (AmmoLand.com)
LINK: “‘Kill That White Man!’: 78-Year Old Man Beaten By 6 Youths in Alleged Racially-Motivated Attack” (TheBlaze.com)
LINK: “Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin” (WSJ.com)
LINK: “Latino organizations dismiss George Zimmerman, question his ethnicity” (DailyCaller.com)
LINK: “Special prosecutor will not use grand jury in Trayvon Martin investigation” (CNN.com)
LINK: “Third News Network Admits to False Reporting on George Zimmerman” (RushLimbaugh.com)
LINK: “‘Race Wars’ Part 1: The Shocking Data on Black-on-Black Crime” (theBlaze.com)
LINK: “George Zimmerman to be charged in Trayvon Martin shooting, official says” (WashingtonPost.com)
LINK: “Mike Tyson on George Zimmerman: ‘It’s a disgrace he hasn’t been shot yet’” (news.yahoo.com)
LINK: “AP: Zimmerman has too many rights” (DailyMail.com)
LINK: “Sanford Blacks Beat White Man With Hammer – Not a Hate Crime” (ReaganiteRepublicanResistance.blogspot.com)
LINK: “The MainSleaze Media Story On Trayvon Is Crumbling” (Market-Ticker.org)
LINK: “Ann Coulter: Negroes With Guns” (TownHall.com)
LINK: “Twitter lynch mob: George Zimmerman is out on bail? Let’s kill him!” (Twitchy.com)
LINK: “Beating of Alabama man not seen as hate crime, despite claim ‘Trayvon’ invoked” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)” (TheBlaze.com)
LINK: “George Zimmerman: Prelude to a shooting” (Reuters.com)
LINK: “Zimmerman’s Lawsuit Against Al Sharpton, NBC, and the Martin Family Attorneys” (Examiner.com)
LINK: “Zimmerman Medical Report Shows Broken Nose, Lacerations After Trayvon Martin Shooting” (ABCNews.go.com)
LINK: “Autopsy results show Trayvon Martin had injuries to his knuckles” (PalmBeachPost.com)
LINK: “911 call shows Zimmerman stopped following Martin after dispatcher’s request, corroborates story” (DailyCaller.com)
LINK: “Trayvon Martin Shooting Call1″ (audio recording of 911 call) (Wikipedia.org)
LINK: “Where’s the ‘Probable Cause’?” (NationalReview.com)
LINK: “What Zimmerman, Martin medical reports tell us and the media didn’t” (FoxNews.com)
LINK: “Shooting of Trayvon Martin” (including several more 911 recordings) (Wikipedia.org)
LINK: “Witness Told Cops He Saw Trayvon Martin Straddling George Zimmerman And Punching Him ‘MMA Style’” (Citizens4Freedom.com)
LINK: “Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman’s Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting” (ABCNews.go.com)
LINK: “Wave of black mobs brutalizing whites” (WND.com)

—–
UPDATE: As more of the evidence and eyewitness accounts have become exposed, I am no longer of the mind that this was a crime. A poor judgement call on the part of Zimmerman, perhaps, in getting to close to the person he was observing — isn’t the whole point of noting that a person is a potential threat that you don’t want to become entangled in that threat? However, the self-defense claim is beginning to sound the most plausible of all the projected scenarios. I do still believe, though that Stand Your Ground is irrelevant here — it would only matter if there was a point of decision (after Zimmerman perceived that Martin was an immediate threat) at which he had to decide whether to run or stand… being knocked to the ground and beaten (as more eyewitnesses than not have corroborated) makes the option of fleeing seem less accessible. The only question in his mind at that point was likely whether to live or be killed — I challenge anyone who has had their head beaten on a sidewalk to say otherwise.

—–

The following is in regard to an open investigation — meaning that evidence is still being collected, and witnesses are still reporting in. No trial has yet taken place; but that hasn’t stopped Race-Baiters from foaming at the mouth. What we do know is that Zimmerman, acting under the cause of Neighborhood Watch, reported to 911 that he observed an individual heading into his neighborhood that didn’t look like he belonged; the 911 operator advised (not an order) that Zimmerman not pursue — but he followed Martin anyway. What happened after that is still being pieced together — but that hasn’t slowed down the shouting, the threats of violence, the signs and banners, and the Racist-heavy rhetoric. At first (as an illustration of how eager Racists have been to judge), this was called a ‘white-on-black’ murder — and only after it was made clear that Zimmerman is hispanic was that toned down to ‘targetting an innocent 17-year-old because he was black’. I point this out only to note the fact that for the first two days of this rabid, angry mob — they didn’t even know enough of the basic facts to stop calling Zimmerman a white man. But they knew enough to tell the cops that if they didn’t immediately arrest him, they would be taking matters into their own hands…

While this is still under investigation, what right do the citizens have to prejudge this, pre-trial? I’m annoyed that Al Sharpton has been given another reason to come out from under his rock.

Hypothetical: Zimmerman was STUPID enough to follow when told not to; then, whether he actually spoke to to Martin or not, he was on his way back to his car when Martin jumped him from behind (some may say justifiably so?) because Zimmerman was being a jerk and deserved a beat-down (no argument from me) — this is the story that is shaping up from eyewitness accounts.

What is made out to be a hate-crime may have been simply two guys who made VERY poor choices — and one ended up dead.

Personally, I’m quite sure that Zimmerman will get time for this, and deserves to. But the mob mentality that prejudges and sets aside the professional duties of the police is not justified here. From the accounts that the police and local news have released, it’s not clear that Zimmerman ‘chased’ him, regardless of what Al Sharpton, et al are claiming.

The fact that he did follow Martin was harrassment, not necessarily racially-motivated — though clearly walking into a situation he had no right to participate in (beyond notifying the police). Everything else is conjecture — and the boy’s age has nothing to do with how tragic this story is.

Let the cops do their job.

—–
A brief note about ‘Stand Your Ground’ (SYG) — since it has been raised by many arguing about this altercation. The Stand Your Ground laws do not apply to this case, as Zimmerman followed Martin in the first place… he deliberately ‘walked into’ a situation that he could have avoided simply by NOT following Martin, as the 911 operator advised.

Let’s be clear about what Stand Your Ground Means. Before this concept was allowed under many states’ and municiple legislation, firearm holders were REQUIRED in many places to make an effort to leave the area when threatened, rather than holding position and defending one’s person, property, and other bystanders. The net result of this was that in many courtrooms, those who defended themselves with deadly force were reprimanded under the logic that they should have tried to flee — regardless of whether they felt their attackers would continue pursuit, whether there were children on-scene that needed protection, whether there was even any logic to the idea that an attacker might feel just as compelled to attack a mobile victim as one standing still.

But in the case of Zimmerman/Martin, it appears (so far) that since Zimmerman put himself in this position to begin with, the SYG concept does not apply to his justification for deadly force.

Now, regardless of whether either or both men were justified (or stupid) in their escalations, it’s much more likely that Martin had a reasonable defense under SYG — meaning that he had every right to stand and fight rather than run, if he felt his chances for survival were better that way.

—–
Third point and then I’ll quit. What makes this a Racial Incident is the arrival of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and the New Black Panthers. Oh, and the illigitimate commentary by our President (a la Cambridge Cops ‘acting stupidly’). Oh, and lest we forget — the media frenzy that has prejudged the situation and put Zimmerman’s life in jeopardy on a national scale.

On this point, we will judge the content of the character — of these individuals — much more harshly than they will judge Zimmerman or Martin. They are all self-serving Racist Bastards*.

—–
*Definition of ‘Bastard’: A person who show no evidence of having been adequately parented.

 

Ed Note: Wow, I wrote this post a day ago after seeing the speech mentioned on Facebook, and scheduled it to publish on the morning of the 23rd; since I’ve very recently resurrected this blog after a long hiatus after being hacked, I’m trying to put up exactly one post per day. Now, this story is getting aired all over the place; and I’m hoping that it gets 10 minutes of attention from everyone who can vote — we need to be aware of the playing field; and that we are all too often the pawns (a.k.a. ‘useful idiots’).

“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn’t exist.” (Charles Baudelaire) That his ideas are really notions that we came up with ourselves, in our unfettered human genius. That we are not led by him, and shouldn’t be led by anyone else, either.

The following speech was broadcast by legendary ABC Radio commentator Paul Harvey on April 3, 1965 — see if any of the ideas he lists as threats to mankind are familiar to you in our day:

If I were the Devil . . . I mean, if I were the Prince of Darkness, I would of course, want to engulf the whole earth in darkness. I would have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree, so I should set about however necessary to take over the United States.

I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.” To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square”. In the ears of the young marrieds, I would whisper that work is debasing, that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be extreme in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct. And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to say after me: “Our Father, which art in Washington ..”

If I were the devil, I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull an uninteresting. I’d threaten T.V. with dirtier movies and vice versa.

And then, if I were the devil, I’d get organized. I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing and less work, because idle hands usually work for me.

I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. And I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.

If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects but neglect to discipline emotions . . . let those run wild. I would designate an athiest to front for me before the highest courts in the land and I would get preachers to say “she’s right.”

With flattery and promises of power, I could get the courts to rule what I construe as against God and in favor of pornography, and thus, I would evict God from the courthouse, and then from the school house, and then from the houses of Congress and then, in His own churches I would substitute psychology for religion, and I would deify science because that way men would become smart enough to create super weapons but not wise enough to control them.

If I were Satan, I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg, and the symbol of Christmas, a bottle.

If I were the devil, I would take from those who have and I would give to those who wanted, until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. And then, my police state would force everybody back to work. Then, I could separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines, and objectors in slave camps.

In other words, if I were Satan, I’d just keep on doing what he’s doing.

Paul Harvey, Good Day.

Most people are aware that Barack Obama, the current President of the United States, gained some fame and/or noteriety for teaching activists how to organize to effect change — in ways that specifically and deliberately ‘broke’ the status quo. “Rules for Radicals” was written by the mentor of Obama’s mentors, Saul Alinsky — and when you read of the tactics employed by Obama’s ‘students’, it is clear this can be taken as a textbook for their tactics, motivations, and amoral impunity. Reading this volume gives us a sense of why Conservatives lose when playing any game at all with the Left, and I strongly recommend that you take an afternoon and consume this telling ‘instruction manual’ for subversives.

All the world’s truest religions teach that it’s necessary to know who the Devil is to understand how he threatens us, and why. In life and politics, our need to combat the enemies of freedom requires no less of an education.

From the author’s dedication inside the front cover: “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to knowwhere mythology leaves off and history begins or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”

[Available as an eBook at Amazon] [Commentary] [Synopsis on Conservapedia.com]

 

LINK: ‘Job seekers getting asked for Facebook passwords’ (CBSNews.com)
LINK: ‘Not Just No, Hell No!’ (Forbes.com)
LINK: +facebook +employers +password +candidate (Google.com)

I am SHOCKED at how many individuals cannot grasp the HUGE difference between allowing access to one’s profile CORRECTLY (for instance, by ‘friending’ them on Facebook), and alternately, giving another person (potential employer, in-law, roommate, significant other, etc.) ACCESS to MASQUERADE AS YOU by logging in with your credentials.

Though I haven’t yet checked (I will), I’m pretty sure this goes against the terms of service laid out by most social networks — but even if it isn’t, this horribly dark request can be easily illuminated by matching it in a different context. For instance:

  • I might be OK with an employer knowing who my family members are — but no one can convince me to provide them access to my children unattended.
  • I would likely be fine with them having my home address; but it would be idiotic for me to give them a duplicate key and let them ransack my house while I’m away.
  • It may be true that knowing who my friends are could be valuable in ascertaining what kind of person I am; but letting someone log into my Facebook account and ask my friend questions while pretending to be me is out of the question!

When an employer asks questions like this, say you’ll be reporting them — THEN REPORT THEM.

Mar 212012
 

I first saw this when I was 14 years old; and it had a big impact on me. Still trying to figure out the author (there are several urban legends linked to it):

He always wanted to explain things.
But no one cared.
So he drew.
Sometimes he would draw and it wasn’t anything.
He wanted to carve it in stone or write it in the sky.
He would lie out on the grass and look up in the sky.
And it would be only him and the sky and the things inside him that needed saying.

And it was after that he drew the picture.
It was a beautiful picture.
He kept it under his pillow and would let no one see it.
And he would look at it every night and think about it.
And when it was dark, and his eyes were closed, he could still see it.
And it was all of him.
And he loved it.

When he started school he brought it with him.
Not to show anyone, but just to have with him like a friend.
It was funny about school.
He sat in a square brown desk
Like all the other square brown desks
And he thought it should be red
And his room was a square brown room.
Like all the other rooms.
And it was tight and close.
And stiff.

He hated to hold the pencil and chalk,
With his arm stiff and his feet flat on the floor.
Stiff.

With the teacher watching and watching.

The teacher came and spoke to him.
She told him to wear a tie like all the other boys.

He said he didn’t like them.

And she said it didn’t matter.

After that they drew.
And he drew all yellow and it was the way he felt about morning.
And it was beautiful.

The teacher came and smiled at him.
“What’s this?” she said.
“Why don’t you draw something like Ken’s drawing? Isn’t it beautiful?”

After that his mother bought him a tie.
And he always drew airplanes and rocket ships like everyone else.
And he threw the old picture away.

And when he lay alone looking at the sky,
It was big and blue and all of everything,
But he wasn’t anymore.

He was square inside.
And brown.
And his hands were stiff.
And he was like everyone else.

And the things inside him that needed saying didn’t need it anymore.
It had stopped pushing.
It was crushed.
Stiff.
Like everything else.

 

Polyester does not come from an animal — but from a plant. A petroleum plant.

Though you might make different choices from mine, I am happy to use the bag my hamburger came in to make boots, basketballs, briefcases, belts, and brassieres. (If people want to make sure the cow lives and dies without suffering, then we’re all happy.)

But until we figure out how to manufacture more than a good time from hemp, I’m at peace with using the resources we’re given, so long as we’re not wasteful and abusive.

For instance, I agree that we should find ways to pollute less — so I ride a motorcycle to work (an hour each way) instead of driving my 1996 Buick.

But most passers-by don’t know that I’m making a choice that is smart — all they see is that my motorcycle STILL uses gas and oil. When they throw food at me, they think they’re improving the Earth.

The only net effect of this is that I no longer concern myself with others’ ideology.

 

“If you are taught bitterness and anger, then you will believe you are a victim. You will feel aggrieved and the twin brother of aggrievment is entitlement. So now you think you are owed something and you don’t have to work for it and now you’re on a really bad road to nowhere because there are people who will play to that sense of victimhood, aggreivement and entitlement, and you still won’t have a job.” -Condi Rice

Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it. -Proverbs 22:6

 

I’ve become really perturbed at the number of my ‘educated’ friends who have never heard of Margaret Sanger — and yet they campaign on the righteousness of Planned Parenthood for hours at a stretch. Hapless boobs.

[Ed note: I have just now removed a link here to a great article, from which I had quoted two paragraphs -- because the author has contacted me, explaining that providing the title of her article, linking to it, and putting her words in quotes, is not the same as giving her the credit she so richly deserves for all her hard work and research. To ensure that I will never make the mistake again, THIS blogger (with very little patience left) is removing her from all feeds on all sources I read. I wouldn't want to offend...]

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood: In Her Own Words (DianeDew.com)

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics (Hnn.com)

Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a co-called “Master Race.”

But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn’t originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement’s campaign for ethnic cleansing.

Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed “unfit,” preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in “colonies,” and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.

The Negro Project: Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Plan for Black Americans (CitizenReviewOnline.org)

Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and “purity,” particularly of the “Aryan” race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the “fit” to reproduce and the “unfit” to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the “inferior” races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.

Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th-century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race.2 He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this “population crisis.” According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people.3 His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy.

Feb 162012
 

We assume those who want to hurt us are armed. But there are some who believe that EVERY armed American makes our society more dangerous — despite data that clearly shows dramatically and consistently more petty larceny, violent assaults, and death in areas where guns are outlawed.

Following is from the psyche of a real Armed American — completely counter to the reckless, angry primitives that the Left portray us as. These thoughts, among others, are on my mind every time I vote.

—–
I want lots of cops to live in my neighborhood. Quite a few do; but even when they are home, they likely couldn’t hear my family scream for help from our house.

I want my pilot armed. I want to know that no matter what has happened in the passenger area, if someone has managed to breach the door to the pilots’ cabin, I’d like to trust that the high percentage of military service among professional airline pilots counts for something more than their ability to read a dial on a dashboard.

I want my teachers armed. For every school-campus shooting, there were laws and restrictions on gun possession that the attacker did not obey — but their victims did.

I want my community leaders armed. In the hope that an understanding of basic human rights, as endowed by our Creator, are part of what makes a leader an effective Representative of his or her constituents, an elected official should mirror an understanding of not just our rights — but also the responsibilities of each individual to protect themselves and those around them from harm.

I want my employer to be armed. Workplace violence is primarily an issue of social balance and operational security; but when customers, vendors, or employees threaten the safety of innocent bystanders — someone on-site should be prepared to be more effective than phoning for a cleanup crew afterward.

I want my family armed. Even though one of my primary responsibilities as a husband and father is the protection of and provision for those who depend on me at home — when I am not there, these needs do not dissolve.

I want my neighbors to be armed. Those who are familiar and properly trained to handle firearms correctly, as with any power tool they might have in their garage, are less likely to fail at protective action than those who frightfully avoid learning how to behave appropriately should an unforeseen circumstance provide them opportunity to defend their lives.

I want my fellow citizens to be armed. Any enemy of our country, foreign or domestic, should have an unwavering fear of an armed populace, not only of the on-the-clock professionals among our police and National Guard.

I want every off-duty soldier armed. Despite the hard training and economic commitment toward making the men and women in our Armed Forces capable and careful with the tools they use when deployed, many areas of the country foolishly discount that investment and treat each of these people as a danger to society when they are not in formation.

I want those who would do harm to be unable to discern who is armed and who isn’t. The mystery of whether an angry, crazy or larcenous individual will meet significant resistance cannot be measured to support either side of this argument; but statistics do show that deaths increase when an attacker gets a guarantee of no armed resistance (such as in states with heavy restrictions or in gun-free zones defined by municipalities or posted signage).

Those who actually take the time to peruse statistics provided by the law enforcement community learn that accidental injuries that involve firearms are less of a problem than any of the following: school sports, driving an automobile, slipping in the shower, food poisoning, or burning to death in your own home. But the Left is not trying to outlaw volleyball, driving, bathing, restaurants, or candles — because none of those activities threaten Statism.

Don’t be fooled by those who claim you don’t share in a responsibility to protect yourself, and that laws and signs will do a better job than your own deliberate attention. In the Left’s mythical and miraculous utopia that has not a single gun, the bad guys will still have bats, forks, boxcutters, and microphone cord to coerce our behavior or even end your life. And their level of commitment to evil cannot be legislated away — though your ability to combat it can.

 

Insurance is for unforseen circumstances — not to shoulder the cost of ‘expendables’ (like aspirin, chicken soup, and condoms). Any politician or media personality that tries to convince you that Conservatives don’t want Liberals to have access to contraception is forgetting the basic fact that even though we would be happy if Lefties didn’t breed so much, it’s only the killing of pre-born babies that we have fought against for years — and the Left’s demonization of Conservative viewpoints about the State’s attack on religious freedom is only so much desperate whining now that it’s clear that the Sanger folks are losing footing among the majority of Americans. No matter how inconvenient you rate it — PREGNANCY IS NOT A DISEASE.

“Claiming Conservatives object to contraception = saying anti-farm subsidies is an objection to eating. @conservcompend http://t.co/IM1MGwHz

http://blamebush.typepad.com/blamebush/2009/01/its-official-republicans-hate-sex.html

It’s Official: Republicans Hate Sex

Rejoice, rejoice, rejoice! Bush is out, Obama is in, and a rightfully Democratic Congress is poised to pass a comprehensive stimulus package that will pull us out of the Great Depression II and put the Bush years behind us once and for all! It’s as if the entire world has wheezed a sigh of relief. For the first time in my life, I am proud of my country.

But when I woke up this morning, the Repugs had already ruined it for me. It appears that the few remaining neocons in Congress have scuttled a key provision of the stimulus package that would’ve provided free contraception for ordinary Americans.

WHAT IN THE NAME OF GODDESS IS THEIR PROBLEM? WE WON THE ELECTION, DAMMIT, NOT THEM! AMERICANS VOTED UNANIMOUSLY FOR CHANGE LAST NOVEMBER, SO REPUBLICANS NEED TO EITHER STOP OBSTRUCTING OBAMA AND OBEY HIM, OR JUST SIT DOWN, SHUT UP, AND LET DEMOCRATS FIX THE MESS BUSH MADE!

And if there’s one thing that can jump start an ailing economy, it’s FREE RUBBERS!

Think about it. You lost your job. They’ve foreclosed on your home. You have nothing left in your pockets but a couple bucks and a handful of condoms. So you go downtown and pick up a 2-dollar whore to help you forget your troubles. The hooker gives your money to her pimp, who uses it to buy some bling at the pawn shop. The pawnbroker spends his money on some more expensive hookers, who are freelancing to pay their tuition at Berkeley. Their Gender Studies professym makes a downpayment on a new hybrid car. The car dealership buys more hyrids from the manufacturer to meet the rising demand. Autoworkers get a little extra in their paychecks. Once you subtract taxes and union dues, they have just enough left to go downtown a pick up a 2-dollar whore. The cycle begins anew.

Trickle-down Reaganomics are a failed philosophy, as the current state of our economy has shown. Trickle-UP economics will be the way of our Brave New World, but it won’t work if Republicans don’t get over their hang-ups about sex.

 

From the mailbag — I found this, unsigned:

At the Sunday morning church service, the minister asked if anyone in the congregation would like to express praise for answered prayers.

A lady stood and walked to the podium.

She said, “I have a Praise.

Two months ago, my husband, Tom, had a terrible bicycle crash and his scrotum was completely crushed. The pain was terrible and the doctors didn’t know if they could help him.”

You could hear a muffled gasp from all the men in the congregation as they imagined the pain that poor Tom must have experienced. “Tom was unable to hold me or the children,” she went on, “and every movement caused him terrible pain. We prayed as the doctors performed a very delicate operation, which lasted for over five hours, and it turned out they were able to piece together the crushed remnants of Tom’s scrotum, and wrap wire around it to hold it in place.”

Again, the men in the congregation were unnerved and squirmed uncomfortably as they imagined the horrible surgery that was performed on Tom.

“Now,” she announced in a quavering voice, “thank the Lord, after six weeks, Tom is now out of the hospital and the doctors say that with time, his scrotum should recover completely.”

All the men sighed with relief.

The minister rose and tentatively asked if anyone else had something to say.

A man stood up and walked slowly to the podium. He said, “I’m Tom.”

The entire congregation held its breath. “I just want to tell my wife that the word is sternum.”