Statists once again attempting to sway public opinion on self-defense after insane person kills in gun-free zone

Share this thought and add your own

It would be completely absurd to scream and shake our fists in the air that a stop sign needs to be erected where a traffic accident took place — when there is already a stop sign at the corner. But the anti-gun activists claim that making firearms illegal would remove the threat — ignoring the fact that not only was the latest multiple-victim shooting in a ‘gun-free zone’ (as if a criminal or insane attacker obeys laws), AND ignoring the fact that it has been statistically shown over and over again that the safety of a society is harmed, not helped, by stricter gun legislation.

In the video below, Dr. Hupp explains to small-minded ‘intellectul elites’ why the capacity of a magazine is IRRELEVANT to an attacker, and that the Right to Defend was included in our Bill of Rights BECAUSE the world IS a dangerous place — not to MAKE it a dangerous place.

The same Elitists she speaks of use Social Engineering to convince people of all of these ‘modern high ideals’:

  1. teaching children morals is immoral,
  2. parents’ rights are secondary to those of the State,
  3. infanticide is an issue of privacy, not life or death
  4. letting states have rights that supercede federal authority is an ‘old idea with no merit’ (‘State’ now overrides ‘state’),
  5. no citizen ‘needs’ ‘military-grade’ arms to defend themselves or hunt (the 2nd Amendment was not written to guarantee the ability to kill a deer — it was to allow communities to fend off an ARMY)
— those people are either deluded, ignorant, lying, or all three.


Those in the media (more self-congratulatory ‘elites’) who believe that the 1st Amendment will survive long after the 2nd is quashed are fools; don’t be fools along with them!

As we devolve into a country of historically ignorant voters, who among the educated will join them to entrust the State with more power than the Founders had designed? At what point does our very deliberately-constructed Federal Republic fall into a dicatorship? Exactly how much control does the Federal Government need to fulfill their responsibilities to ‘provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity’? How much Freedom must the people LOSE before they realize they have been boiled like a frog?

“On March 23, 1933, the newly elected members of the German Parliament (the Reichstag) met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler’s Enabling Act. It was officially called the ‘Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich.’ If passed, it would effectively mean the end of democracy in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.”

“The ‘distress’ had been secretly caused by the Nazis themselves in order to create a crisis atmosphere that would make the law seem necessary to restore order. On February 27, 1933, they had burned the Reichstag building, seat of the German government, causing panic and outrage. The Nazis successfully blamed the fire on the Communists and claimed it marked the beginning of a widespread uprising.” (“World Hstory Archives: The rise and fall of Adolf Hitler – Hitler’s Enabling Act, 23 March 1933”)

“Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not have been able to murder 21 million people.” -David Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute in Colorado

(Understand that Germany ALREADY HAD ‘gun control’ by the time the Nazis came to power — Hitler’s buddies just enforced the existing law to their own political benefit… When you decide within yourself whether disarming the People is a good idea because you completely trust that the State will not become a Dictatorship, you are trusting that will be true through THIS administration, and the next, and the next, and the next…)

“In Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed by Adolph Hitler, that required police permission of ownership of a handgun. All firearms had to be registered. Germans who enjoyed using bolt-action rifles for target practice were told to join the Wehrmacht if they wished to shoot ‘military’ rifles.” -LaPierre, Guns, Crime, and Freedom, at 167–168.

LINK: “Columbine Survivor Speaks Out About Sandy Hook Shooting; Gives Advice To Grieving Parents” (
LINK: “Columbine Father Darrell Scott Echoes Sentiments Over Sandy Hook Shootings” (
LINK: “Left Believes Drug Controls Don’t Work, So Why Do They Think Gun Controls Will?” (
LINK: “The Progressive Assault on American Liberty – 2nd Amendment Style” (
LINK: “‘Gun Free’ Chicago Ranks #1 as the Deadliest Alpha World City” (
LINK: “Compendium of State Firearms Laws” (
LINK: “More guns equal more crime? Not in 2009, FBI crime report shows. “ (
LINK: “Gun sales surge across US after Newtown amid fears of crackdown” (
LINK: “Rational Basis Analysis of ‘Assault Weapon’ Prohibition” (
LINK: “Connecticut Law About Firearms Law” (
LINK: “What journalists need to know about guns and gun control” (
LINK: “What journalists should know about school shootings and guns” (
LINK: “The Constitutional Right to Be a Parent” (
LINK: “I was anti-gun, until I got stalked” (
LINK: “World Hstory Archives: The rise and fall of Adolf Hitler – Hitler’s Enabling Act, 23 March 1933” (
LINK: “13 Similiarities Between Obama And Hitler” (
LINK: “Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights (Official Movie)” (

Share this thought and add your own